Edition 3 at DIS ballot, stage 40.20/ Planning date 12 September 2027, an estimate/ ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 applies today
ISO 29148 Revision CheckerThe requirements record, clause by clause, and the edition that follows it
A.2.7
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018
Annex A

Annex A.2.7: OpsCon: impacts and analysis

Current editionISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018, Annex A, A.2.7Edition 3 at DIS ballotNo public change recorded

The section summarizes the impacts of the proposed system and analyses it against the current situation.

What annex A.2.7 asks

The section summarizes the impacts of the proposed system and analyses it against the current situation. It covers the operational, organizational, cost, schedule and risk impacts, the affected user classes and interfaces, and the analysis that supports the choice. The level of detail should be enough for a reader to see why the proposed system is viable and what it displaces.

Annex A is normative content and part of a full conformance claim.

Why it matters

The impact summary is what a decision maker reads. The clause expects the analysis to connect the proposed system back to the current one, not to stand alone. The organizational impact is often the largest and the least documented.

In the public record

No clause level change is public for this unit; the DIS keeps the title and scope, and the requirement text is not released.

What good looks like

List the impacts by category, with a named owner and a mitigation where the impact is adverse. Keep the analysis tied to the scenarios and the requirements. Record the impacts that fall on other systems and other organizations.

Evidence an assessor asks for

The assessor will ask who is affected outside the project. An impact summary that names only the project team is incomplete.

  • Impact summary Operational, organizational, cost, schedule and risk impacts, with an owner for each
  • Affected interfaces The systems, organizations and user classes affected by the change
  • Analysis The assessment that supports the proposed system and the alternatives considered
  • Mitigation record The adverse impacts and the mitigation or acceptance

Where it commonly fails

  • The impact is described as positive only, with no adverse effects
  • The analysis repeats the justification without assessing the effect
  • Other systems and organizations affected by the interface are not named

What to do before the revision

Add an external impact row for every interface. The row is the one that prevents a surprise at integration.

Read across

← A.2.6 OpsCon: concepts for the proposed system A.2.8 OpsCon: appendices and glossary →

Full register / Revision record

Source for annex A.2.7: ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018, Annex A.2.7, retrieved 19 October 2026. The revision note rests on ISO page 94091. The requirement, evidence and gaps are written from our record. Every source.