Edition 3 at DIS ballot, stage 40.20/ Planning date 12 September 2027, an estimate/ ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 applies today
ISO 29148 Revision CheckerThe requirements record, clause by clause, and the edition that follows it
6.3.3.6
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018
Processes

Clause 6.3.3.6: Analyze stakeholder requirements

Current editionISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018, Clause 6.3.3.6Edition 3 at DIS ballotNo public change recorded

The complete stakeholder set is analyzed against the individual and set characteristics.

What clause 6.3.3.6 asks

The complete stakeholder set is analyzed against the individual and set characteristics. It is prioritized and classified, and reused requirements are checked for fit, feasibility, availability, quality, cost, value and whether they are current. Critical performance measures are defined so technical achievement can be assessed. The analyzed set is fed back to the stakeholders to confirm it captures their needs, and the issues are resolved through negotiation.

Why it matters

The clause puts validation before the system requirements are written. The feedback step is the stakeholder's chance to say the set is not what they meant. The critical performance measures are the link to verification: without them, the later test has nothing to measure against.

In the public record

No clause level change is public for this unit; the DIS keeps the title and scope, and the requirement text is not released.

What good looks like

Run the characteristic review and the stakeholder review as two separate events. Record the measures, the issues and the negotiation outcome. Do not close an issue by deleting the requirement unless the stakeholder agrees.

Evidence an assessor asks for

The assessor will ask for a measure that shows a stakeholder requirement was achieved. If the measure is defined only at test, the analysis stopped early.

  • Analysis record The set review against the individual and set characteristics, with the issues found
  • Critical performance measures The measures and the requirement each one assesses
  • Stakeholder feedback The review record and the changes made as a result
  • Issue log Each conflict or deficiency, the negotiation and the resolution

Where it commonly fails

  • The set is reviewed for spelling and format, not for the characteristics
  • Critical performance measures are left to the test team
  • Conflicts are closed by removing the requirement, with no stakeholder agreement

What to do before the revision

Hold the stakeholder feedback session before the system requirements baseline. After that point, a change is a change to the baseline, not a review comment.

Read across

← 6.3.3.5 Transform needs into stakeholder requirements 6.3.3.7 Manage stakeholder needs and requirements →

Full register / Revision record

Source for clause 6.3.3.6: ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018, Clause 6.3.3.6, retrieved 19 October 2026. The revision note rests on ISO page 94091. The requirement, evidence and gaps are written from our record. Every source.