Clause 6.2.1: Purpose: business or mission analysis
The process exists to define the problem or opportunity facing the business or mission, describe the solution space, and identify the classes of solution that could address the problem or take the opportunity.
What clause 6.2.1 asks
The process exists to define the problem or opportunity facing the business or mission, describe the solution space, and identify the classes of solution that could address the problem or take the opportunity. It succeeds when seven outcomes are true: the problem and the opportunity are framed; the solution space is characterized; preliminary operational and other life cycle concepts exist; candidate solution classes are identified and analysed; a preferred class is selected; the enabling systems or services are available; and the traceability from the problem to the preferred class is established.
Why it matters
This is the process that prevents a project from starting with a solution. The outcome list is a compact audit checklist. The traceability outcome is often missed: a team can describe a problem and choose a solution without recording why that class was preferred over the others.
No clause level change is public for this unit; the DIS keeps the title and scope, and the requirement text is not released.
What good looks like
Keep the problem statement, the solution classes, the assessment and the decision in one pack. Record the rejected classes and the reason. Link the preferred class to the project authorization so the later requirements work has a parent.
Evidence an assessor asks for
The assessor will ask why this solution class and not another. A pack with no rejected options cannot answer.
- Problem statement A short, dated statement of the problem or opportunity and the evidence behind it
- Solution class analysis The candidate classes, the assessment criteria and the reason each was rejected or preferred
- Life cycle concepts The preliminary operational, acquisition, deployment, support and retirement concepts
- Traceability record The link from the problem to the preferred class and to the project authorization
Where it commonly fails
- The preferred solution is named in the project charter before any analysis exists
- Only one solution class is considered, so the choice is not a choice
- The problem statement is rewritten after the solution is chosen to match it
What to do before the revision
Write the problem statement before the first solution meeting, date it, and keep it even when it changes. The history is the evidence that the analysis was real.
Read across
- 6.2.3.2 Prepare for business or mission analysis
- 6.2.3.3 Define the problem or opportunity space
- 6.2.3.4 Characterize the solution space
- 6.2.3.5 Evaluate alternative solution classes
← 6.1 Requirement processes 6.2.3.2 Prepare for business or mission analysis →
Source for clause 6.2.1: ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018, Clause 6.2.1, retrieved 19 October 2026. The revision note rests on ISO page 94091. The requirement, evidence and gaps are written from our record. Every source.